<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crackerwax &#187; Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crackerwax.com/category/television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crackerwax.com</link>
	<description>don't make me come over there</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Is It With Psychotic Stuffed Bears In Adverts?</title>
		<link>http://www.crackerwax.com/2010/06/05/what-is-it-with-psychotic-stuffed-bears-in-adverts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crackerwax.com/2010/06/05/what-is-it-with-psychotic-stuffed-bears-in-adverts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuffed Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willem Defoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackerwax.com/?p=661012374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesus, no sooner had Willem Dafoe turned up on TV hawking Birds Eye&#8217;s frozen comestibles, than do we get another bunch of borderline psychopathic stuffed animals on the box. This time though it&#8217;s for the Travelodge chain of hotels. Have a look. Slightly less sinister than Willem Dafoe&#8217;s ever so slightly unsettling polar bear but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, no sooner had Willem Dafoe turned up on TV hawking Birds Eye&#8217;s frozen comestibles, than do we get another bunch of borderline psychopathic stuffed animals on the box.</p>
<p>This time though it&#8217;s for the Travelodge chain of hotels. Have a look.</p>
<p><object width="100%" height="332"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z35kfOLsSzo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z35kfOLsSzo&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="100%" height="332"></embed></object></p>
<p>Slightly less sinister than Willem Dafoe&#8217;s ever so slightly unsettling polar bear but I&#8217;m still not certain that sinister is the way to sell things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crackerwax.com/2010/06/05/what-is-it-with-psychotic-stuffed-bears-in-adverts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Didnae See Thay Guys Leave No?</title>
		<link>http://www.crackerwax.com/2010/05/15/602029073/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crackerwax.com/2010/05/15/602029073/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 23:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limmy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tumblr.crackerwax.com/post/602029073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Limmy; the second funniest Scotsman in the world. The guy&#8217;s a genius!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.limmy.com/">Limmy</a>; the <a href="http://www.crackerwax.com/about/">second funniest Scotsman</a> in the world.</p>
<p><object width="400" height="336"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VamC5YeZvsQ&amp;rel=0&amp;egm=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VamC5YeZvsQ&amp;rel=0&amp;egm=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="336" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<p>The guy&#8217;s a genius!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crackerwax.com/2010/05/15/602029073/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble With Terminators</title>
		<link>http://www.crackerwax.com/2009/12/08/the-trouble-with-terminators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crackerwax.com/2009/12/08/the-trouble-with-terminators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crackerwax.com/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right. We&#8217;ve had The Terminator, Terminator 2: Judgement Day, Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machine, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles and now Terminator: Salvation. So, what have we learnt about Terminators from all these films? Well, they&#8217;re practically indestructible aren&#8217;t they? Well, except in Terminator: Salvation where it seems like they could be taken out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. We&#8217;ve had <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/">The Terminator</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103064/">Terminator 2: Judgement Day</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181852/">Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machine</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0851851/">Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles</a> and now <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0438488/">Terminator: Salvation</a>. So, what have we learnt about Terminators from all these films?</p>
<p>Well, they&#8217;re practically indestructible aren&#8217;t they? Well, except in Terminator: Salvation where it seems like they could be taken out with a pea shooter. </p>
<p>The entirely inconsistent nature of damage sustained by Terminators is &#8211; ironically &#8211; the only consistent thread between all the movies and the TV series!<span id="more-469"></span></p>
<p>In The Terminator they get torn in half by grenades yet in Terminator: Salvation they can survive multiple rounds of automatic fire to the head at point blank range and rocket launchers aimed at their chests but at the same time they&#8217;re offed alarmingly quickly by two shots to the temple &#8211; one assumes this only works if they&#8217;re pinned down under a helicopter though?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at the effects of molten metal shall we?</p>
<p>Ok. In Terminator 2 Arnie melts himself in molten steel. At the end. A quick thumbs up, gurgle, gurgle, melty melt. Yet, <em>yet</em> in Terminator: Salvation we see a Terminator get covered in &#8211; what we must assume to be &#8211; molten Terminator alloy and there&#8217;s not a single bit of damage.</p>
<p>Sure it crusts up like <a href="http://www.chow.com/stories/10709">Magic Shell</a> but it isn&#8217;t long before it breaks free of its crispy coating and is on the rampage again.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re surely not telling us that being covered in molten alloy does no damage to Terminators at all? Logically the alloy most likely has a lower melting point than steel and &#8211; given &#8211; there wasn&#8217;t a big bath of it. It was poured all over the Terminators head though? For fuck&#8217;s sake surely there&#8217;d be some damage. Surely?</p>
<p>Anyway, moving on from the roll of the dice Terminator coconut shy for a moment let&#8217;s move on to the physics involved in moving a Terminator around.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re big. Really big. At least 6&#8243; 2&#8242;, built like brick shit houses and judging by the momentum they seem to have they must weigh at least 500 kilos if not more.</p>
<p>So riddle me this: how can they sit on motorbikes and ride in jeeps without any noticeable effect on the suspension of said vehicles?</p>
<p>In Terminator 2 a T800 is seen zooming down flood channels on a motorbike and at one point even does some <a href="http://www.play.com/DVD/DVD/4-/581896/Napoleon-Dynamite/Product.html">sweet jumps</a> on said bike, but never at any point does the bike crumple under the immense weight of a Terminator with a shotgun!</p>
<p>Similarly in Terminator:Salvation a Terminator is seen getting in to a Jeep with a couple of kids, who&#8217;d have a combined weight of around 80 kilos &#8211; if they were soaking wet &#8211; yet the Jeep neither rocks nor sways as this hulking metal monstrosity clambers in. </p>
<p>How?!</p>
<p>Look I&#8217;m as willing as the next person to suspend belief &#8211; and c&#8217;mon Christian Bale leading the human resistance! &#8211; but there&#8217;s a line right? Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crackerwax.com/2009/12/08/the-trouble-with-terminators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hirrarious!</title>
		<link>http://www.crackerwax.com/2008/06/09/hirrarious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crackerwax.com/2008/06/09/hirrarious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackerwax.com/2008/06/09/hirrarious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Big Brother is shaping up to be quite good actually. I know I might rail against television a lot of the time, but I do like Big Brother, it&#8217;s a study in human relations. The only thing I have a problem with is the fact that the producers do seem to be a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new <a href="http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/">Big Brother</a> is shaping up to be quite good actually.</p>
<p>I know I might rail against television a lot of the time, but I do like Big Brother, it&#8217;s a study in human relations. The only thing I have a problem with is the fact that the producers do seem to be a little bit Machiavellian when it comes to picking the mentally ill.</p>
<p>My favourite to win probably has to be Dennis, although Mario and Lisa seem like a very nice couple and probably deserve to win.</p>
<p>The rest of them are a mixed bunch. Alexandra strikes me as a queen bitch, with a chip on her shoulder the size of a small family saloon, her default attitude is opposition which when combined with her natural aggression becomes a volatile combo.</p>
<p>Stephanie may only be nineteen, but she really has to learn to stop pouting quite so much. The world doesn&#8217;t revolve around you love.</p>
<p>God I need to stop watching this sort of thing, it&#8217;s rotting my brain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crackerwax.com/2008/06/09/hirrarious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Lucas: Super Whore!</title>
		<link>http://www.crackerwax.com/2008/04/17/george-lucas-super-whore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crackerwax.com/2008/04/17/george-lucas-super-whore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crackerwax.com/2008/04/17/george-lucas-super-whore/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After my recent dismay at Jackie Chan advertising for Woolworths it has come to my attention that they have a new sponsor. It&#8217;s safe to say that Woolworths have now well and truly jumped the advertising shark. As if Jackie Chan wasn&#8217;t inappropriate enough they&#8217;re now using Darth Vader to hawk toasters. Darth Vader. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After my recent dismay at Jackie Chan advertising for Woolworths it has come to my attention that they have a new sponsor. It&#8217;s safe to say that Woolworths have now well and truly jumped the advertising shark.</p>
<p>As if Jackie Chan wasn&#8217;t inappropriate enough they&#8217;re now using Darth Vader to hawk toasters. Darth Vader. <em>The</em> Darth Vader, the one from Star Wars. </p>
<p>The most evil man in the universe can now be seen on television preparing beans on toast. Watch and cringe.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OBd3gyq6sBw&#038;hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OBd3gyq6sBw&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>Has George Lucas not got enough money already? Does he really need to let the only decent thing he ever created be seen on television toasting bread with a lightsaber? Does his description of Darth Vader&#8217;s path through life fit with selling toasters?</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7224080/">This first trilogy is really about the father, the struggles of a father, or a man, basically, to find himself, and at the same time fall into a trap of wanting certain powers, making a pact with the devil and basically spending the rest of his life regretting it.</a></p></blockquote>
<p>No. No it does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crackerwax.com/2008/04/17/george-lucas-super-whore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
