Pay Attention Games™
Games™ and their appalling proof reading.
I’d always thought that writing for a magazine would mean that you had a good grasp of the language you were writing in. Look at this from the Gmaes™ review of Guitar Hero III.
The bit underlined in red is unforgivable. What sort of people do they have writing for them, glue sniffers?
I just cannot understand why it is that Gmaes™ never spot these errors before they go to print. what does their editor do? I can’t believe for one second that the entire magazine isn’t proofread before publication? I mean, really?
Come on, I know timescales are tight in the magazine business but fundamental errors of grammar like this shouldn’t happen, let alone be allowed out there in the published magazine.
Still, I could of really loosed my temper over there disregard, this as to stop.
Comments
Do they not have a proof-reader in their employ? Wnakers*
*acceptable spelling as established by one Mr. J. Douglas, I believe.
Wnakers, is a comedy device of such subtlety as to be indistinguishable from error!
[...] shit like this from time to time. At least it’s better than Gmaes™ which seems to desperately avoid proof reading and basic grammar in favour release [...]
Post a comment